FANDOM


DNA-Untersuchung der Nachkommen des Großfürsten Gediminas von Litauen und Rurik

zurück

QR-Code-DNA-Gediminas-DNA-Untersuchung der Nachkommen des Großfürsten Gediminas von Litauen und Rurik

Zitieren-dieses-Artikels Empfohlene Zitierweise

„DNA-Untersuchung der Nachkommen des Großfürsten Gediminas von Litauen und Rurik“, in: WIKIa Szlachta [Onlinefassung]; URL: http://www.de.szlachta.wikia.com/, Zugang .. . .. . 201. .

Y-DNA (37  +  6 additional markers) database including Rurikid and Gediminid princes and also those males who suspect that they descend either from Rurik (the 1st Russian prince, 9th century), or from Gedimin (The Grand Duke of Lithuania, 13th cent.). База У-ДНК хромосомы Рюриковичей и Гедиминовичей. Baza chromosomu Y (Y-DNA) Rurykowiczów i Gedyminowiczów.


Hier ist die  Untersuchung der Nachkommen des Großfürsten Gediminas von Litauen und Rurik (derzeit bestehen im WIKIa technische Probleme bezüglich einer vernünftigen farbigen Präsentation der Ergebnisse, wie sie im Original vorliegt. Nachdem diese gelöst werden, wird diese provisorische Datei abgelöst werden). 

Zusammenfassend kann man festhalten:

1. Rurik und Gediminas entfernte Kusinen waren. Damit wurde von einigen polnischen Historikern vertretene Hypothese falsifiziert, dass Gediminas ein Dienstmannen war und sich an die Macht geputscht habe,

2. Fürsten Chowański des Wappens Pogoń Litewska tatsächlich von Gediminas abstammen und andere Hypothesen wie die vom 1996 verstorbenen Prof. Chowański aus Konigsberg nicht zutreffen.

Quelle:

Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rurikid/


Contains currently the following surnames,

Rurikids:

Bariatynski, Belosselsky-Belozersky, Czetwertynski, Drucki (Droutskoy), Gagarin, Gorchakov, Khilkov, Korybut-Woroniecki, Kropotkin, Kubensky, Kurbatsky (Kurbsky ?), Lobanov-Rostovsky, Lvov, Mozarowski (and variants), Mozhaysky, Myshetsky, Niewmierzycki (and variants), Obolensky, Ossowiecki, Poscharsky, Putyatin, Puzyna, Rostowsky, Rzhevsky, Shahovskoi, Solomin, Szuyski, Tolloczko, Ushakov, Vadbolsky and Volkonsky, and

Gediminids:

Golitsin (Galitzine), Chowański (Khovansky), Chartorisky (Czartoryski), Trubetskoy (Trubecki), Urban(owicz), Svistunov, Cuthie (Jakutowicz), Davidenas (Dawidowicz ?) and Barteit.


However, not all of them were found to be genuine descendants of Rurik or of Gedimin, respectively. Besides, it was discovered that a couple of Volkonsky, Obolensky and Bariatynsky princes belong to Slavic (genetic haplogroup R1a1) branch.

Thanks to Russian Nobility DNA Project which tested one of the Volkonsky princes who belongs to the N1c1 haplogroup and is well matching other Rurikids, we can say that by all means a NPE event occurred in case of some of these princes.

Besides, thanks to this, i.e. Rurikid project, we can now say that Rurik was a historical person who was born on the Roslagen seashore (slightly north of Stockholm, Sweden). However, he was of Finno-Ugrian descent (haplogroup N1c1 (earlier described as N3a)). Although all of well matching N1c1 Rurikid princes are descended from Yaroslav Mudry (978 – 1054), it seems that his ancestors including Rurik (b. ab. 820 – 876) himself, also belonged to this haplogroup.

A group of Swedes, whose ancestors lived in or close to Uppsala, and whose genetic haplotypes are very close to these of the Rurikids, seems to be confirming the theory that Rurik, in fact, originated from Sweden. Prince Piotr Szuyski is also of Slavic descent (R1a1). However, he is neither matching the mentioned Volkonskys/Obolenskys, nor he is matching other R1a1 Rurikid princes. Prince Kropotkin is really descended from Rurik. However, by no means is he descended from the princes of Smolensk. His princely branch needs to be reconsidered again. Gedimin, the Grand Duke of Lithuania, and Rurik the Viking chieftain and the 1st Russian prince, were very distant cousins. They shared a common male ancestor ab. 2200 years ago.

It is not clear whether the noble Urbanowicz, Jakutowicz and Svistunov (Swistun, Swistunow) families are illegitimate descendants of Gedimin, or if they rather belong to Gediminid branches that were forgotten by genealogists.

Prince Jerzy Czartoryski of Canada decided to have his Y-DNA tested in spite of what historians speculate(d) about the descent of his princely branch. It is believed that his G...Grandmother, the princess Izabella Czartoryska (nee Fleming) had her 1st son with the Rurikid prince Nikolai Vasilievich Repnin, while it was Armand-Louis de Gontaut-Biron, Duc de Lauzun, who fathered the 2nd son, Konstanty, from whom Prince Jerzy descends. Prince Jerzy was found to be descended from a Germanic tribe (R1b1). He can still be descended from the French, since the majority of them are of Germanic origin. What counts here is that Prince Jerzy inherited the title of Prince, as well as family tradition, from his legal ancestors, the Czartoryski princes. On the other hand, however, provided that he really is descended from the Gontaut-Birons, this duly means that he is a genetic descendant of this old French family, which has roots at least as far back as the 12th century.

Prince Stanislaw Antoni Czetwertynski was found to belong to the I2a2 haplogroup. By no means is he descended from Rurik. His genetic haplotype is typical for the native population of the Belarussian-Ukrainian Polissiya region. This can also mean that Prince Tur(e), who founded the dynasty of the Turov-Pinsk princes, wasn’t at all descended from Rurik.

Results on this page are freely available to anyone who wishes to use them for comparative and non-commercial purposes, also provided that a link to this web site is created.

This database can be useful for many males. By using this in a simple way they can check whether they have (or haven’t) descended from Rurik. It was also believed that the Gediminid princes were descended from Rurik on the Polotsk branch. However, the preliminary results do suggest that this is not really so, although Gedimin originated from Baltic Finno-Ugrians. Another idea would be to create the so-called modal Y-DNA pattern for Rurik, as well as for Gedimin. However, this may be possible later, when some more test results will become available. Nevertheless, the preliminary modal haplotypes for Rurik and Gedimin have been created.

The tests were performed with the Family Tree DNA Co. http://www.familytreedna.com/ in the group program “Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project”. 37 characteristic markers are displayed in columns 1 to 37, respectively. The larger is the number of matching markers, the closer is kinship of the two males. If the markers are not perfectly matching, just for the sake of readability they have been displayed with different colours in reference to the modal haplotypes of Rurik and of Gedimin. The more the background is becoming orange and red, the larger is the positive genetic distance, while the more the background is becoming green and blue, the larger is the negative genetic distance in each of the markers, respectively. This is shown in the label below. However, the (total) genetic distance from either the modal Rurik or Gedimin in all compared markers should not exceed a couple of units. If this is really so, it means that another tested male is their (distant) cousin. This is marked with green (Rurikids, Gediminids), or light green (Proto-Rurikids, Proto-Gediminids).

The database also includes a certain number of other people, especially the Finns belonging to the N1c1 haplogroup, which are neither related by blood with Rurik, nor with Gedimin. They have been marked with light blue, and described as being “Distant cousins”. These results are kept in the project for a particular reason : no one still knows from where the ancestors of Rurik arrived in Sweden, as well as from where the ancestors of Gedimin arrived in the Baltic countries (possibly this was Povolzhe in Russia). On the basis of genetic distances, as well as on the basis of WTY (Walk Through the Y chromosome) results, one can now anticipate that the Finno-Karelian (L550-) and others (L550+) (especially those of the Rurikids and Gediminids) separated already in Siberia ab. 4500 – 6000 years ago. However, these tests are by no means completed to the point that one can make any final conclusion here.

Mutation rates in markers marked with pink background are larger (0.003 to 0.005), and those marked with violet background are extremely large (above 0.005) compared with an average mutation rate (which is something like 0.0024). However, in the so-called genetic calculator one can also use different mutation rates in each of the marker panels. Estimated more precisely by the FTDNA Co., the average mutation rates are as follows : 0.00399 (markers 1 – 12), 0.00481 (markers 13 – 25), and 0.00748 (markers 26 - 37), respectively (http://www.mymcgee.com/tools/yutility.html#MutationRate) . And this is also clear evidence that the markers 26 – 37 are most important in genetic genealogy.

When comparing the markers 1 –25 one can only SUSPECT that the two tested males might be related by blood if their markers are matching. By ALL MEANS one needs to check the markers 26 – 37, and especially the fast mutating markers like CDYa, CDYb and DYS 570, to be absolutely CERTAIN that, IN FACT, he IS related by blood with another man. A lot of Y-DNA test results do appear on the Y-search.org database (http://www.ysearch.org/) when the two males are e.g. perfectly matching on their first 12 markers; a certain mismatch, however small, can appear on the 2nd panel (markers 13 - 25); while a considerable mismatch on the 3rd panel (markers 26 – 37) is clear evidence that they are not related by blood at all (in historical times – 50-60 generations ago).

Thanks to this project I can verify real mutation rates, and these have been displayed below. The rates are calculated per the entire 37 markers haplotypes and per century. The time that passed by is a difference between the year in which the Y-DNA tests were performed, and the year when the common male ancestor (CMA) was born.

Surname and Surname and Haplogroup Common male Year born Centuries to Genetic Distance Mutation rate per 37 markers haplotype and per century
Genetic Distance Mutation rate per 67
given name given name ancestor (CMA) the CMA on 37 markers on 67 markers  markers haplotype and per century
(in blue SNP test) FTDNA standard
Webmaster’s standard
FTDNA standard
Webmaster’s standard
FTDNA standard
Webmaster’s standard
FTDNA standard
Webmaster’s standard
RURIKIDS N1c1 (***) AVERAGE 0.5311 0.5293 0.8576 0.8430
Gagarin Rzhevsky N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 3@ 3@ 0.4649@ 0.4649@    
G.G. Nikolai Monomakh
Gagarin Rzhevsky N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 4 4 0.4188 0.4188 8 8 0.8377 0.8377
A. P. Nikolai Monomakh
Gagarin Khilkov N1c1 Andrei F. Ab. Jul 18 4 4 0.5571 0.5571 8 8 11.142 11.142
A. P. Starodubsky 1290
Gagarin Kropotkin N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 8 8 0.8368 0.8368 10 10 10.460 0.9414
A. P. Monomakh
Gagarin Putiatin N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 9 9 0.9414 0.9414 14 14 14.644 14.644
A. P. Monomakh
Gagarin Vadbolsky N1c1 Vsevolod 1154 Aug 55 6 6 0.7018 0.7018 11 11 12.865 12.865
A. P. Yurievich
Gagarin Puzyna N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 15 15 15.707 15.707
A. P. Jakub Monomakh
Gagarin Shahovskoy N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 7 7 0.7322 0.7322
A. P. Monomakh
Gagarin Lobanov- N1c1 Vsevolod 1154 Aug 55 7 6 0.8187 0.7018
A. P. Rostovsky Yurievich
Gagarin Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 6 6 0.5820 0.5820
A. P. Mudry
Gagarin Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 10 10 10.460 10.460
A. P. Woroniecki Monomakh
Rzhevsky Khilkov N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 4 4 0.4184 0.4184 4 4 0.4184 0.4184
Nikolai Monomakh
Rzhevsky Kropotkin N1c1 David R. Ab. Aug 79 4 4 0.4188 0.4188 6 6 0.6826 0.6826
Nikolai Smolensky 1130
Rzhevsky Putiatin N1c1 Mstislav 1076 Sep 33 7 7 0.7503 0.7503 8 8 0.8574 0.8574
Nikolai Vladimirovich
Rzhevsky Vadbolsky N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 6 6 0.6276 0.6276 7 7 0.7322 0.7322
Nikolai Monomakh
Rzhevsky Puzyna N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 11 11 11.518 11.518
Nikolai Jakub Monomakh
Rzhevsky Shahovskoy N1c1 David R. Ab. Aug 79 6 6 0.6826 0.6826
Nikolai Smolensky 1130
Rzhevsky Lobanov- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 10 9 10.460 0.9414
Nikolai Rostovsky Monomakh
Rzhevsky Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 9 9 0.8729 0.8729
Nikolai Mudry
Rzhevsky Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 13 13 13.598 13.598
Nikolai Woroniecki Monomakh
Khilkov Kropotkin N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 3 3 0.3138 0.3138 4 4 0.4184 0.4184
Monomakh
Khilkov Putiatin N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 6 6 0.6276 0.6276 8 8 0.8368 0.8368
Monomakh
Khilkov Vadbolsky N1c1 Vsevolod 1154 Aug 55 4 4 0.4678 0.4678 5 5 0.5850 0.5850
Yurievich
Khilkov Puzyna N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 7 7 0.7330 0.7330
Jakub Monomakh
Khilkov Shahovskoy N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 6 6 0.6283 0.6283
Monomakh
Khilkov Lobanov- N1c1 Vsevolod 1154 Aug 55 8 8 0.9357 0.9357
Rostovsky Yurievich
Khilkov Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 5 5 0.4850 0.4850
Mudry
Khilkov Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 9 9 0.9414 0.9414
Woroniecki Monomakh
Kropotkin Putiatin N1c1 Mstislav 1076 Sep 33 10 10 10.718 10.718 12 12 12.862 12.862
Vladimirovich
Kropotkin Vadbolsky N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 5 5 0.5230 0.5230 7 7 0.7322 0.7322
Monomakh
Kropotkin Puzyna N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 9 9 0.9424 0.9424
Jakub Monomakh
Kropotkin Shahovskoy N1c1 Rostislav M. 1125 Aug 84 4 4 0.4525 0.4525
Smolensky
Kropotkin Lobanov- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 8 8 0.8368 0.8368
Rostovsky Monomakh
Kropotkin Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 5 5 0.4850 0.4850
Mudry
Kropotkin Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 11 11 11.506 11.506
Woroniecki Monomakh
Vadbolsky Putiatin N1c1 Mstislav 1076 Sep 33 6 6 0.6431 0.6431 7 7 0.7503 0.7503
Vladimirovich
Vadbolsky Puzyna N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 10 10 10.471 10.471
Jakub Monomakh
Vadbolsky Shahovskoy N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 55 9 9 0.9424 0.9424
Monomakh
Vadbolsky Lobanov- N1c1 Vasily K. 1219 Jul 89 5 5 0.6337 0.6337
Rostovsky Rostovsky
Vadbolsky Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 8 8 0.7759 0.7759
Mudry
Vadbolsky Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 10 10 10.460 10.460
Woroniecki Monomakh
Shahovskoy Lobanov- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 10 9 10.460 0.9414
Rostovsky Monomakh
Shahovskoy Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 7 7 0.6790 0.6790
Mudry
Shahovskoy Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 11 11 11.506 11.506
Woroniecki Monomakh
Lobanov- Massalski N1c1 Yaroslav 978 Okt 31 11 10 10.669 0.9699
Rostovsky Mudry
Lobanov- Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 13 12 13.598 11.639
Rostovsky Woroniecki Monomakh
Massalski Korybut- N1c1 Vladimir 1053 Sep 56 12 12 12.552 12.552
Woroniecki Monomakh
RURIKIDS R1a1 0.7600 0.7600
Volkonsky Obolensky R1a1 Taurussky Ab. Jul 88 6 6 0.7614 0.7614 11 11 13.959 13.959
John Yuri Yuri 1220
Volkonsky Volkonsky R1a1 Volkonsky Ab. Jun 79 6 6 0.8837 0.8837 7 7 10.309 10.309
John O. Fedor I. 1330
Volkonsky Bariatynsky R1a1 Taurussky Ab. Jul 88 6 6 0.7614 0.7614
John Yuri 1220
Volkonsky Obolensky R1a1 Taurussky Ab. Jul 89 7 7 0.8872 0.8872 12 12 15.209 15.209
O. Yuri Yuri 1220
Volkonsky Bariatynsky R1a1 Taurussky Ab. Jul 89 5 5 0.6337 0.6337
O. Yuri 1220
Obolensky Bariatynsky R1a1 Taurussky Ab. Jul 89 4 4 0.5070 0.5070
Yuri Yuri 1220
GEDIMINIDS N1c1 (0.5486) (0.8424) (0.8424)
Chowański Chartorisky N1c1 Gedimin Ab. Jul 38 4 4 0.5420 0.5420 5 5 0.6775 0.6775
Askold Alex 1270
Chowański Golitsin N1c1 Patrikiy Ab. Jun 79 4 4 0.5891 0.5891 6 6 0.8837 0.8837
Askold Narimuntovich 1330
Chowański Trubetskoy N1c1 Gedimin Ab. Jul 39 4 4 0.5413 0.5413 6 6 0.8119 0.8119
Askold 1270
Chartorisky Golitsin N1c1 Gedimin Ab. Jul 39 2 2 0.2706 0.2706 5 5 0.6766 0.6766
Alex 1270
Chartorisky Trubetskoy N1c1 Algirdas Ab. 07. Feb 4 4 0.5698 0.5698 7 7 0.9972 0.9972
Alex Gediminovich 1307
Golitsin Trubetskoy N1c1 Gedimin Ab. Jul 39 4 4 0.5413 0.5413 8 8 10.825 10.825
1270
TAWAST CLAN (***; 3) AVERAGE 0.4645 0.3787
Tawast Stjerna N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 4 3 0.7874 0.5906        
Hannu Antti Henrik
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1660 Mrz 47 2@@ 2@@ 0.5764@@ 0.5764@@        
Hannu Veikko Christoffer
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1660 Mrz 47 3 3 0.8646 0.8646        
Hannu J. Christoffer
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast 1802 02. Jul 1@@ 1@@ 0.4831@@ 0.4831@@        
Hannu T. Alexander
Tawast Bergh N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1590 Apr 17 2 2 0.4796 0.4796        
Hannu P. Johan
Stjerna Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 2 1 0.3937 0.1969        
Antti Veikko Henrik
Stjerna Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 3 2 0.5906 0.3937        
Antti J. Henrik
Stjerna Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 3 2 0.5906 0.3937        
Antti T. Henrik
Stjerna Bergh N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 2 1 0.3937 0.1969        
Antti P. Henrik
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast 1758 Feb 50 1 1 0.4000 0.4000        
Veikko J. Frederik
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1660 Mrz 47 1 1 0.2882 0.2882        
Veikko T. Christoffer
Tawast Bergh N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1590 Apr 17 0 0 0 0        
Veikko. P. Johan
Tawast Tawast N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1660 Mrz 47 2 2 0.5764 0.5764        
T. J. Christoffer
Tawast Bergh N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 1 1 0.1969 0.1969        
T. P. Henrik
Tawast Bergh N1c1 Tawast Ab. 1500 05. Aug 1 1 0.1969 0.1969        
J. P. Henrik
Vines Vines N1c1 Vines Ab. Mrz 46 2@@ 2@@ 0.5764@@ 0.5764@@        
Fred Ron John 1660
Vines Vines N1c1 Vines 1725 Feb 81 1@ 1@ 0.5267@ 0.5267@        
Fred Paul B. Edward
Kosonen Kosonen N1c1 Kosoin 1713 Feb 94 1 1 0.3436 0.3436
Roy Eino Petteri
Fletcher Fletcher N1c1 Fletcher 1829 Jan 79 3 2 16.760 11.173
Brien Richard John S.
Komulainen Komulainen N1c1 Komulainen 1703 03. Jun 4 4 13.071 13.071
Eero Jari Samuel
Hiltunen Hiltunen N1c1 Hiltunen 1718 Feb 91 2 2 0.6873 0.6873
Paavo Jari Matti
Lapinski Lapinski R1a11 Lapinski Ab. Apr 98 4 4 0.8032 0.8032
“Wzorek” „Bodaj” Jakub 1510
Lapinski Lapinski R1a1 Lapinski Ab. Mai 58 5 5 0.8961 0.8961
„Kus” „Bodaj” Wit 1450
Lapinski Lapinski R1a1 Lapinski Ab. Mai 88 4 4 0.6803 0.6803
„Rosman” „Bodaj” „Lapa” 1420
Lapinski Lapinski R1a1 Lapinski Ab. Mai 58 5 5 0.8961 0.8961
„Wzorek” „Kus” Wit 1450
Lapinski Lapinski R1a1 Lapinski Ab. Mai 88 3 3 0.5102 0.5102
„Rosman” „Kus” „Lapa” 1420
Lapinski Lapinski R1a1 Lapinski Ab. Mai 88 6 6 10.204 10.204
„Rosman” „Wzorek“ „Lapa” 1420
VENTER CLAN (***; 4) AVERAGE 0.8991 0.8991
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
Piet #89593 (v. Dempter)
#73298 Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
Piet #87173 (v. Dempter)
#73298 Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 0 0 0 0
Piet #87825 (v. Dempter)
#73298 Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 0 0 0 0
Piet #132347 (v. Dempter)
#73298 Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 6 6 17.341 17.341
Piet #143506 (v. Dempter)
#73298 Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 4 4 11.561 11.561
#89593 #87173 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
#89593 #87825 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
#89593 #132347 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 8 8 23.121 23.121
#89593 #143506 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
#87173 #87825 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 2 2 0.5780 0.5780
#87173 #132347 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 8 8 23.121 23.121
#87173 #143506 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 0 0 0 0
#87825 #132347 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 6 6 17.341 17.341
#87825 #143506 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Venter Venter R1a1 Venter 1663 Mrz 46 6 6 17.341 17.341
#132347 #143506 (v. Dempter)
Hendrik
Kossacki- Kossacki- R1a1 1900 01. Aug 2 2 18.519 18.519
Lytwyn Lytwyn
Lukasz Jacek
Plewako Plewako I2a2 Plewako 1822 Jan 87 1 1 0.5348@@ 0.5348@@    
Stanislaw J. Stanislaw G. Kazimierz
Plewako Plewako I2a2 Plewako Ab. Mrz 94 4 4 10.152 10.152
Stanisław J. Damian Pawel 1615
Plewako Plewako I2a2 Plewako Ab. Mrz 94 3 3 0.7614 0.7614
Stanislaw G. Damian Pawel 1615